Considerations To Know About h4831sc load data
Considerations To Know About h4831sc load data
Blog Article
I picked up a 50ct. box of 160 Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to burn off the powder and projectiles on workup when all I've is fifty bullets. But I really need to find a bullet in the 160 class that my more mature rifle likes.
They've got performed identically for me. Like everyone else I rushed to obtain the newer SC Model but have now switched back again. Ideally you'd like about one hundred% loading density. When you've got enough situation potential for that H4831(extended) you're in all probability far better off.
4gr of H4831sc and Federal 215 primers. I found this combo produces .5MOA teams with velocity about 3020fps from a 26" barrel. I take advantage of this exact same powder in my 300wm taking pictures 180gr drugs, so It really is nice to acquire one particular powder for both equally.
Sure you can. They can be the identical precise powder however the SC powder is simply Minimize shorter so it meters far better.
Novice to reloading. This will probably be employed for a 300wsm with 215 bergers. I used to be capable to get my fingers on a couple pounds of h4831.
I am aware, tough moments. H4831SC will definitely do the job, I just failed to like the situation density when loaded very long. I do not don't forget powder cost off the very best of my head but I was launching a Berger 168gr VLD at 3,000fps which happens to be the place I normally goal to become. Inside your case employing what you may have (and what I must have completed) I'd begin with the end of your bearing floor on the bullet proper in the shoulder/neck junction, and flirt with extending seating depths from there once you look for a velocity node.
If there's no load data it can be because this powder just isn't appropriate for this cartridge. Commonly one particular will not likely find 1 powder to fit all cartridges, as well as the household of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) you are inquiring about isn't going to get the job done.
Like mentioned over, exact same stuff. Everything is different is the scale with the kernels. I did listen to h4831 vs h4831sc somewhere that they are going to only make the SC Down the road. I have no idea if that is certainly correct or not but would make sense to me. I exploit SC for the reason that that is definitely what I located in the eight lb jug and it works.
I've uncovered the exact opposite to generally be correct in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with a hundred and eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a much faster and equally precise powder in my three hundred Win Mag.
Why would I point out this? What exactly is my issue? I'm unsure that there's a actual legitimate point aside from what is well-known with most hasn't been popular with me in any way in these situations. Do I just Use a powder jinx or something? Simply h4831sc load data to teach you how crazy I really am, tomorrow I h4831 vs h4831sc am array tests a friends new .
I've experienced equivalent encounter with H4350. For me, some ball powders won't shoot perfectly with anything at all except Fed215's. Some parts just Do not play very well with other. Appears like you have selected three fantastic powders, I might anticipate a minimum of one of these to shoot.
Like Anyone mentioned, the SC means “short Reduce” and is also a little bit simpler to meter. Can make you problem why they might continue to make the frequent one.
Several of the aged Lyman data just outlined IMR 4831, which was surplus armed service powder and now more recent mfg as H4831.
The container did not hold the "Serious" brand on it. A coworker And that i then swapped some powder, and I wound up with another pound of H4831SC, this a person Using the "Excessive" emblem on it.